- English
- français
- Deutsche
- Contact us
- Docs
- Login

When a cloud provider experiences an outage, businesses that depend solely on that platform face limited options: wait for their vendor to restore service, or execute an emergency restoration on an alternative provider, which requires rebuilding infrastructure from scratch.
The days of putting all your digital eggs in one cloud basket are fast coming to an end. In the past, choosing a cloud provider was a gamble for B2B software teams, and switching providers meant rebuilding infrastructure from scratch, a costly and time-consuming process. Today's customers expect rapid recovery from disruptions, making single-vendor dependency a significant business risk. When a provider goes down, it doesn't just frustrate users; it halts operations for every business that depends on you.
This is why multi-cloud platforms have become essential infrastructure for business operations. Multi-cloud platforms enable enterprises to use portable configuration across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM, and OVHcloud, making provider transitions and disaster recovery more manageable without multiplying operational complexity.
This article breaks down what "multi-cloud for B2B" actually means, what a true multi-cloud platform should provide, and how Upsun's multi-cloud platform simplifies disaster recovery with portable configuration. While multi-cloud doesn't eliminate downtime during major outages, it enables your team to execute planned restoration procedures faster and more predictably than emergency infrastructure rebuilds.
When businesses first adopt cloud infrastructure, most choose a single provider to keep things simple. This approach keeps everything under one roof, either AWS, Azure, IBM, Google Cloud, or any other cloud provider. Single cloud deployment is well-suited for organizations with straightforward requirements, limited geographic reach, or those just starting their digital transformation. Startups and smaller companies often benefit from this approach during their initial growth phases. However, what happens when a cloud provider suffers an outage, and businesses depend solely on that platform?
Challenges of a single cloud provider
The appeal of a single cloud is obvious: one provider to deal with, one bill to pay, and one ecosystem to manage. For smaller teams or companies just starting their cloud journey, this simplicity feels like a relief. But over time, cracks begin to show. While single-cloud simplicity appeals to early-stage companies, relying solely on one provider creates both technical and business risks that grow more severe as your organization scales.
The outage risk: when your single provider fails, everything fails
Even the most reliable cloud providers experience disruptions. A regional outage or service failure can cause critical downtime lasting hours and render your entire infrastructure inaccessible. Without alternative infrastructure, your disaster recovery options are limited to the same provider's backup regions, which may also be affected during major incidents.
Vendor lock-in
When all workloads and data are tied to a single platform's tools and services, switching to another provider becomes difficult and costly. This lock-in restricts your freedom to innovate and gives that provider significant control over your costs. Price changes, storage fees, or network costs can rise unexpectedly, making it harder to forecast budgets or maintain predictable expenses. Without viable alternatives, you have limited leverage to negotiate or switch providers.
Limited flexibility and performance
A single provider may not offer the best global coverage or data-center locations for all your customers. This can lead to slower performance in certain regions and limit your ability to optimise workloads for different environments or compliance requirements.
Compliance and data residency limits
Different regions have different rules on data storage and processing. Depending on a single provider may mean their data center locations do not meet regional regulatory or customer requirements, putting compliance at risk.
Limited innovation options
Cloud providers innovate at different speeds. Depending on a single vendor may prevent you from utilizing newer tools, frameworks, or AI services available elsewhere, thereby slowing product development and competitiveness.
These complexities make the transition from single-cloud to hybrid or multi-cloud a strategic necessity for most organizations.
The limitations of single cloud have led many businesses to hybrid cloud. Hybrid cloud combines public cloud services (like AWS or Azure) with a company's private cloud or on-premises data center. Hybrid cloud mixes public and private infrastructure under one management approach. For companies with legacy systems that can't be easily migrated, hybrid offers a practical path forward. It allows them to modernize customer-facing applications in the cloud while keeping core systems on-premises.
But a hybrid cloud comes with its own challenges. Managing hybrid environments requires teams to master two distinct operational models: cloud-native tools and traditional on-premises infrastructure, which often creates silos and divided expertise. This eventually makes scaling across geographies far more complicated than it should be.
That brings us to multi-cloud, the model that has become the end state for many B2B deployments.
A multi-cloud platform is a cloud-based platform that enables businesses to run applications and workloads across two or more cloud providers while maintaining a unified management experience. Using multi-cloud platforms, companies can deploy, manage, and scale applications across multiple cloud providers without rewriting code or reconfiguring architecture for each provider.
Organizations approach multi-cloud in different ways. Some run different workloads on different providers using one provider for core applications, another for data analytics, or other specific services. Others maintain entirely separate deployments for different customers or regions. This article focuses on a third approach: configuration portability. Rather than maintaining active deployments across multiple clouds simultaneously, this strategy uses consistent configuration that works across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and OVHcloud, enabling disaster recovery, strategic provider transitions, and deployment flexibility.
The advantages of this approach are clear. Companies gain vendor independence, resilience against outages, and the ability to deploy closer to clients worldwide. For B2B organizations, this translates into faster performance, stronger compliance guarantees, and more leverage when negotiating costs. The drawback, of course, is complexity. Managing multiple providers often means juggling different dashboards, inconsistent environments, and duplicate processes. Without the right platform, multi-cloud can overwhelm the very teams it was meant to empower.
Now that we have defined single-cloud, hybrid, and multi-cloud, let’s simplify the decision. The table below compares each option's strengths, weaknesses, and when to choose it.
| Strategy | What it is | Strengths | Trade-off | Good fit when… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single cloud | Run everything on one public cloud. | Simple tooling, one bill, one skill set, fast to start. |
| You’re an early-stage company, moving fast, or your compliance needs are minimal. |
| Hybrid cloud | Mix public cloud with private cloud/on-prem. |
|
| You have regulated data or mainframe/legacy systems you can’t move yet. |
| Multi-cloud | Use two or more public clouds for your application portfolio, with each app deployed to the most suitable provider. |
|
| Customers or contracts demand specific providers/regions, or you need resiliency across vendors. |
Cloud outages remain a persistent challenge. While overall outage frequency has improved over the past several years, organizations across industries continue to experience disruptions, from brief service degradations to multi-hour regional failures. For B2B businesses, the stakes are particularly high when your platform goes down: you're not just losing access to your tools, you're preventing your customers from serving their customers, creating a cascade of operational failures.
Single-provider dependency means your business continuity plan is only as good as your vendor's uptime. When that vendor experiences issues, you have no alternatives, no failover options, and no control over recovery timelines. This isn't a theoretical risk; it's a recurring reality that's driving the shift toward multi-cloud architectures.
B2B multi-cloud platforms must deliver specific technical capabilities that distinguish true multi-cloud platforms from basic multi-provider compatibility tools.
While the benefits are undeniable, many companies underestimate the complexity of a multi-cloud. Each provider has its own ecosystem, its own console, and its own quirks. Running two or more clouds often introduces duplicate pipelines, “snowflake” environments, and scattered logs. Development environments start to drift apart, so what works in one region doesn’t behave the same in another. The ops team, on the other hand, juggles upgrades, observability, and security controls across vendors. The result is slower releases and more risk.
Also, costs become difficult to predict without unified visibility. For B2B businesses, where client trust and compliance are on the line, these challenges can’t be ignored. Multi-cloud without the right platform can quickly create more risk than it resolves.
Upsun was built for this exact challenge. Managing multi-cloud often means juggling different tools, configurations, and procedures for each provider. Upsun provides cloud-provider abstraction designed for B2B organizations that need flexible deployment across multiple cloud providers.
With Upsun, you define your infrastructure once using portable YAML configuration that works across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM, and OVHcloud. When a major outage occurs, your team executes documented restoration procedures using this consistent configuration, without having to rebuild provider-specific infrastructure during a crisis.
What this means in practice: If your primary cloud region suffers a severe incident, you initiate a planned restoration to a different provider or region. Your portable configuration, tested procedures, and Git-driven workflow make restoration significantly faster than emergency infrastructure rebuilds.
Note: Upsun does not provide automated cross-region or cross-cloud failover. Instead, it gives teams the building blocks to execute business continuity and disaster recovery with confidence using portable configuration, tested procedures, and consistent workflows that your operations team controls.
Upsun provides abstract deployment from underlying cloud providers, offering a consistent workflow across supported regions. Organizations can deploy applications using unified YAML configuration files that work consistently across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM, and OVHcloud regions. Users can choose regions based on criteria such as closeness to users and environmental impact, while maintaining identical development tools, web interfaces, and Git-based workflows.
This abstraction eliminates the typical complexity associated with multi-provider strategies. Development teams avoid learning provider-specific tools, such as AWS CloudFormation, Azure Resource Manager, or Google Cloud Deployment Manager, instead working through Upsun's unified interface, which allows the platform to manage provider-specific implementations.
Upsun simplifies disaster recovery through portable configuration. Define your application infrastructure once in YAML files that work across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM and OVHcloud. When a cloud provider experiences an outage, your operations team can execute tested procedures to migrate to a different provider using the same configuration and Git workflow.
This turns disaster recovery from a complex, provider-specific challenge into a manageable process. Instead of maintaining separate runbooks or rebuilding during a crisis, your team executes one documented workflow. While migrations still require time for planning, testing, data migration, and DNS updates, Upsun's portable configuration makes the process significantly more predictable and faster than emergency infrastructure rebuilds.
Upsun can spin up production-perfect clones: data, config, and code, on any branch, enabling teams to test applications with real data rather than mocks or stale information. This functionality allows teams to validate application behavior and ensure consistent performance characteristics across different underlying cloud providers.
Upsun's abstraction layer enables teams to get the benefits of multi-cloud testing without the complexity of managing separate environments on each platform.
Upsun includes built-in observability tools with infrastructure metrics, APM, profiling, and tracing. These monitoring capabilities function consistently whether applications run on Azure's European regions, AWS's North American infrastructure, or Google Cloud's Asia-Pacific locations.
The platform's observability suite provides unified visibility into application performance and infrastructure health regardless of the underlying cloud provider, eliminating the complexity of managing separate monitoring tools for each cloud platform.
Upsun provides transparent and predictable pricing options with environmental impact considerations, offering discounts for deploying to lower-carbon regions across Azure, AWS, IBM, Google Cloud, and OVHcloud. This approach enables organizations to make informed deployment decisions based on both cost and environmental factors without managing separate billing relationships with each cloud provider.
Upsun includes managed security features like Web Application Firewall, DDoS protection, and security patching that work consistently across all supported cloud providers. The platform handles provider-specific security configurations while maintaining standardized security postures regardless of deployment location.
Upsun offers deployment options across various regions through major cloud providers, supporting compliance with various data sovereignty requirements.
Organizations can reduce the impact of cloud outages by implementing portable multi-cloud configuration and tested restoration procedures. When a provider experiences an outage, downtime is inevitable but teams with portable configuration execute documented restoration workflows in hours rather than spending days rebuilding infrastructure from scratch. This requires advance preparation: a 90-day implementation plan including disaster recovery drills, data replication strategies, and tier-based recovery objectives for different services.
For B2B companies focused on sustainable growth, operational resilience, and competitive positioning, multi-cloud platforms have evolved from strategic options to essential infrastructure requirements. The critical decision involves selecting platforms that deliver genuine business value, rather than focusing on technical complexity.
Multi-cloud isn't about chasing every provider; it's about giving your B2B team choice (regions, providers), resilience (no single-vendor risk), and control (performance, cost, compliance) without multiplying operational work. A platform approach is what makes that practical. Upsun makes multi-cloud practical with a single, Git-driven workflow and portable YAML configuration. Each branch receives a production-like preview, allowing teams to validate changes before merging.
You select the provider and region for each project, maintaining the same pipelines, and observability across all locations. Book a demo to see Upsun multi-cloud in action with production-like branch previews.